Energy Equity

Energy Burden and Race: What the Research Actually Shows

Direct answer: Multiple ACEEE studies and peer-reviewed research have found that Black and Hispanic households carry a higher average energy burden than the national average, a pattern researchers link to housing stock quality, historical housing discrimination, and income disparities rather than energy usage habits.

Quick Answers

Is this about how much energy is used?

No — research generally finds that low-income and communities of color consume less energy on average than wealthier households, yet still carry a higher burden because they're more likely to live in less energy-efficient housing.

What's cited as the underlying cause?

Researchers point to a combination of housing stock age and quality, historical redlining and housing discrimination, and income levels — not usage behavior.

Is there active policy work on this?

Yes — DOE's Clean Energy for Low Income Communities Accelerator and various state programs specifically target these disparities.

What the data shows

Academic research (Kontokosta, Reina, and Bonczak 2019; Drehobl and Ross 2016; among others) consistently finds Black, Indigenous, and Hispanic households facing higher energy burdens than the national average.

Why usage isn't the explanation

Because these same households are documented to use less energy on average, not more, the burden gap is best explained by housing quality and income rather than consumption habits.

The housing stock connection

Living in older, less-efficient housing — itself linked to historical housing policy and segregation — is repeatedly identified as a primary driver in this research.

Want to see where you personally stand? Check your own CCM Energy Score, free and takes under a minute.